4.5 Article

Ultrastructural characteristics and conduction velocity of olfactory receptor neuron axons in the olfactory marker protein-null mouse

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 866, 期 1-2, 页码 227-236

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02291-5

关键词

olfactory marker protein; OMP; olfactory receptor neurons; conduction velocity; axon diameter; mouse; gene targeting; knock-out

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC00347, DC02588, DC03195] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) axon diameters and the conduction velocity of the compound action potential along ORN axons were studied in olfactory marker protein (OMP)-null mice and genotypically matched controls. The compound action potential was distinguished from postsynaptic field potentials by its shorter latency, its persistence following application of cobalt or kynurenic acid that blocked postsynaptic responses, and its ability to follow paired-pulse stimulation at 300 Hz. Blockade of the postsynaptic field responses by kynurenic acid indicates that in the mouse, as in the rat, glutamate is the olfactory nerve transmitter. The mean conduction velocity of ORNs in wild-type control mice was 0.47+/-0.19 (S.E.M.) m/s (n=5), similar to the conduction velocity reported for other mammals. The mean diameter of ORN axons in control mice was 0.202+/-0.005 and 0.261+/-0.006 mu m in the OMP-null mice. This increase in fiber diameter in the OMP-nulls predicts an increase in impulse conduction velocity. However, the mean conduction velocity of OMP-null mice, 0.38+/-0.03 m/s (n=6), was not significantly different from control (P>0.1). The conduction velocity predicted by the increase in fiber diameter in OMP-null mice was within the 95% confidence interval of the measured value. Thus, OMP-null ORNs are normal with respect to the conduction velocity of their axons. The number of axodendritic synapses in the glomeruli of OMP-null mice is higher than in congenic wild-type mice. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science BN. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据