4.5 Article

Intervertebral disc cell death is dependent on the magnitude and duration of spinal loading

期刊

SPINE
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 1477-1482

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200006150-00005

关键词

apoptosis; biomechanics; intervertebral disc; spine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Design. An in vivo study of the toxic consequences of static compressive stress on the intervertebral disc. Objectives. To determine whether disc cell death is correlated with the magnitude and duration of spinal compressive loading. Summary of Background Data. Static compression in vivo has been demonstrated to induce cell death. Cell death, in turn, has been associated with disc degeneration humans. There are currently no tolerance criteria for the intervertebral disc that combine both biomechanical and biologic factors, although both have been implicated in cases of accelerated degeneration. Methods. Mouse tail discs were loaded in vivo with an external compression device. Compressive stress was applied at one of two magnitudes (0.4 acid 0.8 MPa) for 7 days, and at one additional magnitude (1.3 MPa) for 1, 3, and 7 days. Midsagittal sections of the discs were stained for apoptosis using the TdT-dUTP terminal nick-end labeling (TUNEL) reaction. Quantal analysis was used to correlate the extent of cell death to the magnitude and duration of loading. Results: The probit transformation of the percentage of dying cells was proportional to the sum of the logarithmic transformations of the compressive stress and the time of loading. Conclusions. The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of developing a quantitative correlation between spinal loading and disc degeneration. Such a correlation may be coupled in the future to existing engineering models that predict spinal loading in response to physical exposures and lead to improved definition of the bounds of healthy and unhealthy spinal loading, and uitimately, refined guidelines for low back safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据