4.7 Article

Synthesis and antiviral evaluation of halogenated β-D- and -L-erythrofuranosylbenzimidazoles

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 12, 页码 2464-2472

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jm990195p

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [UOI-AI31718] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of 2-substituted benzimidazole D- and L-erythrofuranosyl nucleosides were synthesized and tested for activity against herpesviruses and for cytotoxicity. The D-nucleosides 2,5,6-trichloro-1-(beta-D-erythrofuranosyl)benzimidazole (8a) and 2-bromo-5,6-dichloro-1-(beta-D-erythrofuranosyl)benzimidazole (8b) were prepared by coupling 1,2,3,-tri-O-acetyl-beta-D-erythrofuranose (D-6) with the appropriate benzimidazole, followed by removal of the acetyl protecting groups. The 2-isopropylamino (9), 2-cyclopropylamino (10), and 2-mercaptobenzyl (11) derivatives were synthesized by nucleophilic displacements of the C-2 chlorine in the benzimidazole moiety of 8a. The D-nucleoside 4-bromo-5,6-dichloro-2-isopropylamino-1-(beta-D-erythrofuranosyl)benzimidazole (17) was prepared by coupling D-6 with the appropriate benzimidazole. The L-erythrofuranosyl derivatives, 5,6-dichloro-2-isopropylamino-1-(beta-L-erythrofuranosyl)benzimidazole (21a), its 2-cyclopropylamine analogue (21b), and the 2-isopropylamino analogue (4c). In comparison, 8a was 15-fold more active against HCMV than 4a, and 8b was 4-fold more active against HCMV than 4b. The 5,6-dichloro-2-isopropylamino-1-(beta-L-erythrofuranosyl)benzimidazole (21a) was less active than 4c, which is now in clinical trials for HCMV infection. Both 8a,b had comparable HCMV activity to 4c. Mode of action studies with the D-erythrose analogues established that 8b acted by inhibition of viral DNA processing whereas 9 and 10 may act via a different mechanism. The lack of a 5'-hydroxymethyl group in all members of this series established that antiviral activity occurred without 5'-phosphorylation, a feature required for the activity of most nucleoside analogues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据