4.5 Article

Stress and the costs of extra-territorial movement in a social carnivore

期刊

BIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 439-441

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0032

关键词

cooperative breeding; extra group; allostatic load

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council, Magdalene College, Cambridge
  2. Smithsonian Institution
  3. NERC [NE/E013481/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E013481/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Costs associated with extra-territorial movement are believed to have favoured the evolution of delayed dispersal and sociality across a range of social vertebrates, but remain surprisingly poorly understood. Here we reveal a novel mechanism that may contribute substantially to the costs of extra-territorial movement: physiological stress. We show that subordinate male meerkats, Suricata suricatta, exhibit markedly elevated faecal glucocorticoid metabolite levels (a non-invasive measure of hypothalamic pituitary -adrenal axis activity) while conducting extra-territorial prospecting forays. While brief increases in glucocorticoid levels are unlikely to be costly, chronic elevations, arising from prolonged and/or frequent forays, are expected to compromise fitness through their diverse negative effects on health. Our findings strongly suggest that prolonged extra-territorial movements do result in chronic stress, as the high glucocorticoid levels of prospectors do not diminish on longer forays and are no lower among males with greater prospecting experience. A generalized 'stress' of extra-territorial movement may therefore have strengthened selection for delayed dispersal and sociality in this and other species, and favoured the conduct of brief forays over extended periods of floating. Our findings have implications too for understanding the rank-related distribution of physiological stress in animal societies, as extra-territorial movements are often conducted solely by subordinates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据