4.8 Article

Cardiac hypertrophy is not a required compensatory response to short-term pressure overload

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 101, 期 24, 页码 2863-2869

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.24.2863

关键词

hypertrophy; cyclosporine; calcineurin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Cardiac hypertrophy is considered a necessary compensatory response to sustained elevations of left ventricular (LV) wall stress. Methods and Results-To test this, we inhibited calcineurin with cyclosporine (CsA) in the setting of surgically induced pressure overload in mice and examined in vivo parameters of ventricular volume and function using echocardiography. Normalized heart mass increased 45% by 5 weeks after thoracic aortic banding (TAB; heart weight/body weight, 8.3+/-0.9 mg/g [mean+/-SE] versus 5.7+/-0.1 mg/g unbanded, P<0.05), Similar increases were documented in the cell-surface area of isolated LV myocytes, In mice subjected to TABS CsA treatment, we observed complete inhibition of hypertrophy (heart weight/body weight, 5.2+/-0.3 mg/g at 5 weeks) and myocyte surface area (endocardial and epicardial fractions). The mice tolerated abolition of hypertrophy with no signs of cardiovascular compromise, and 5-week mortality was not different from that of banded mice injected with vehicle (TAB+Veh). Despite abolition of hypertrophy by CsA (LV mass by echo, 83+/-5 mg versus 83+/-2 mg unbanded), chamber size (end-diastolic volume, 33+/-6 mu L versus 37+/-1 mu L unbanded), and systolic ejection performance (ejection fraction, 97+/-2% versus 97+/-1% unbanded) were normal. LV mass differed si,significantly in TAB+Veh animals (103+/-5 mg, P<0.05), but chamber volume (end-diastolic volume, 44+/-6 mu L), ejection fraction (92+/-2%), and transstenotic pressure gradients (70+/-14 mm Hg in TAB+Veh versus 77+/-11 mm Hg in TAB+CsA) were not different. Conclusions-In this experimental setting, calcineurin blockade with CsA prevented LV hypertrophy due to pressure overload. TAB mice treated with CsA maintain normal LV size and systolic function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据