4.7 Article

Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 283, 期 24, 页码 3217-3222

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.24.3217

关键词

-

资金

  1. AHRQ HHS [HS 08397] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context Multiple treatment options are available for men with prostate cancer, but therapeutic recommendations may differ depending on the type of specialist they consult. Objective To define and contrast the distribution of management recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for a spectrum of men with prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants Mail survey sent in 1998 to a random sample of physicians in the United States, who were listed as urologists (response rate 64%, n = 504) and radiation oncologists (response rate 76%, n=559) in the American Medical Association Registry of Physicians and practicing at least 20 hours per week. Main Outcome Measure Questionnaire addressing beliefs and practices regarding prostate cancer management. Results Forty-three percent of radiation oncologists vs 16% of urologists would recommend routine prostate-specific antigen testing for men aged 80 years and older. For men with moderately differentiated, clinically localized cancers, and a more than 10-year life expectancy, 93% of urologists chose radical prostatectomy as the preferred treatment option, while 72% of radiation oncologists believed surgery and external beam radiotherapy were equivalent treatments. For most tu mor grades and prostate-specific antigen levels, both specialty groups were significantly more likely to recommend the treatment in their specialty than the other treatment, Both groups reported giving patients similar estimates of the risks of complications due to surgery and radiation. Neither group favored watchful waiting In their treatment management except for a subset of men with life expectancies of less than 10 years and cancers with very favorable prognoses (Gleason score of 3 or 4 and prostate-specific antigen level less than or equal to 5 ng/mL), Conclusions Based on this study, while urologists and radiation oncologists do agree on a variety of issues regarding detection and treatment of prostate cancer, specialists overwhelmingly recommend the therapy that they themselves deliver.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据