4.6 Article

The bile acid taurochenodexoycholate activates a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent survival signaling cascade

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 26, 页码 20210-20216

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M909992199

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA73622] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI36079] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK41876] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver injury during cholestasis reflects a balance between the effects of toxic and nontoxic bile acids. However, the critical distinction between a toxic and nontoxic bile acid remains subtle and unclear. For example, the glycine conjugate of chenodeoxycholate (GCDC) induces hepatocyte apoptosis, whereas the taurine conjugate (TCDC) does not. We hypothesized that the dissimilar cellular responses may reflect differential activation of a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent signaling pathway. In the bile acid-transporting McNtcp.24 rat hepatoma cell line, TCDC, but not GCDC, stimulated PI3K activity. Consistent with this observation, inhibition of PI3K rendered TCDC cytotoxic, and constitutive activation of PI3K rendered GCDC nontoxic. Both Akt and the atypical protein kinase C isoform zeta (PKC zeta) have been implicated in PI3K-dependent survival signaling. However, TCDC activated PKC zeta, but not Akt, Moreover, inhibition of PKC zeta converted TCDC into a cytotoxic agent, whereas overexpression of wild-type PKC zeta blocked GCDC-induced apoptosis, We also demonstrate that TCDC activated nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) in a PI3K- and PKC zeta-dependent manner. Moreover, inhibition of NF-kappa B by an I kappa B super-repressor rendered TCDC cytotoxic, suggesting that NF-kappa B is also necessary to prevent the cytotoxic effects of TCDC, Collectively, these data suggest that some hydrophobic bile acids such as TCDC activate PI3K-dependent survival pathways, which prevent their otherwise inherent toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据