3.8 Article

Levels of peripheral blood cell DNA damage in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus human subjects

期刊

MUTATION RESEARCH-DNA REPAIR
卷 460, 期 1, 页码 53-60

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8777(00)00013-6

关键词

alkaline comet assay; DNA damage; neutrophils; IDDM; %Hba(1c)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in vivo can lead to cellular biomolecule damage. Such damage has been suggested to contribute to the pathogenesis of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). In this study, we used the alkaline comet assay to measure DNA damage (single-stranded DNA breaks and alkali-labile sites) in freshly isolated whole blood, lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils from 23 subjects with IDDM and 32 age- and sex-matched controls. Analysis of the results showed elevated levels of DNA damage (expressed as % comet tail DNA) in the lymphocyte (4.10 +/- 0.47, 3.22 +/- 0.22), monocyte (4.28 +/- 0.47, 3.49 +/- 0.18), and whole blood (4.93 +/- 0.51, 4.51 +/- 0.23) fractions from IDDM subjects compared to controls, respectively, but the increases observed were not statistically significant. However, we found significantly elevated basal levels of DNA damage in the neutrophil fraction (8.38 +/- 0.64, 4.07 +/- 0.23; p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test) in IDDM subjects compared to controls. Given these novel neutrophil findings, we extended the study to include a total of 50 IDDM subjects and 50 age- and sex-matched control subjects and determined basal levels of DNA damage in the neutrophils of all 100 subjects. We found significantly elevated mean levels of DNA damage (8.40 +/- 0.83, 4.34 +/- 0.27; p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test) in the neutrophils from the IDDM subjects when compared to controls. Our results show that even with acceptable glycaemic control there is a significantly elevated level of DNA damage within diabetic neutrophils in vivo. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据