4.6 Article

Clitocypin, a new type of cysteine proteinase inhibitor from fruit bodies of mushroom Clitocybe nebularis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 26, 页码 20104-20109

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M001392200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel inhibitor of cysteine proteinases has been isolated from fruit bodies of a mushroom Clitocybe nebularis, The inhibitor was purified to homogeneity by affinity chromatography and gel filtration, followed by reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatography, The active inhibitor has an apparent molecular mass of about 34 kDa by gel filtration and by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis without prior boiling of the sample. Boiling in 2.5% SDS or incubation in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride resulted in a single band of 17 kDa, indicating homodimer composition with no intersubunit disulfide bonds. The inhibitor in nondenaturing buffer is resistant to boiling in water, retaining its activity and dimer composition. The mushroom protein is a tight binding inhibitor of papain (K(i) = 0.59 nM), cathepsin L (K(i) = 0.41 nM), cathepsin B (K(i) = 0.48 mu M), and bromelain (K(i) = 0.16 mu M) but is inactive toward cathepsin H, trypsin, and pepsin, Its isoelectric point is 4.4, and sugar analysis indicates the absence of carbohydrate, A single protein sequence of 150 amino acids, containing no cysteine or methionine residues, was obtained by amino acid sequencing. The calculated molecular mass of 16854 Da corresponds well with the value obtained by mass spectrometry, A major part of this sequence was verified by molecular cloning. The monomer sequence is clearly devoid of typical cystatin structure elements and has no similarity to any other known cysteine proteinase inhibitors but bears some similarity to a lectin-like family of proteins from mushrooms. The inhibitor, which is present in at least two other members of the Clitocybe genus, has been named clitocypin (Clitocybe cysteine proteinase inhibitor).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据