4.7 Article

Conservation of microsatellite loci within the genus Vitis

期刊

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
卷 101, 期 1-2, 页码 301-308

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s001220051483

关键词

simple sequence repeats; inter-specific priming; molecular markers; grapevine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eleven microsatellites isolated from grapevine (Iritis vinifera) were used to study the degree of conservation of these sequences across different Vitis species. Nine microsatellites were newly isolated, the remaining two (VVS2 and VVS5) came from the literature. A preliminary assay on the conservation of priming sites was carried out on 14 non-V. vinifera species, including relevant taxa for breeding. Parthenocissus quinquefolia was added as representative of a related genus. Cross-species amplification was obtained in 94% of the 176 genotypexlocus tested combinations. Three microsatellite loci were then cloned and sequenced in ten species. The microsatellite repeat was found present in all cases. The repeat region was often longer in V. vinifera than in the other species. Furthermore the nonsource species showed interruptions in the repeat. In spite of these constraints, which could reduce the polymorphism of microsatellites in non-source species, the results demonstrate the possibility of extending the use of microsatellite markers to wild germplasm and interspecific hybrids. Point mutations have been found in microsatellite flanking regions and these variations have been used to investigate the genetic relationship among taxa. The Neighbor-joining tree that was obtained on the basis of ten nucleotide variations, showed that there is not a clear cut difference between American, Asian and European species and that the actual taxonomy which reflects the geographical distribution of species must most likely be revised. Moreover, in general, nucleotide variations which occur in microsatellite flanking regions provide new molecular tools for investigating the evolution of species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据