4.7 Review

Lattice model of living polymerization. III. Evidence for particle clustering from phase separation properties and rounding of the dynamical clustering transition

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 113, 期 1, 页码 434-446

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.481808

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Equilibrium polymerization is studied here as a prototype for clustering transitions that commonly occur in systems of interacting particles at equilibrium. These transitions are often difficult to locate because of transition rounding associated with a limited extent of cluster growth, competing association or dissociation processes that initiate or inhibit clustering, and other constraints on the particle clustering dynamics. Instead of singularities in thermodynamic and transport properties, more subtle property changes signal the onset of particle clustering, explaining why clustering transitions are often overlooked or misinterpreted. We utilize a Flory-Huggins model for the equilibrium (living) polymerization of linear polymer chains to identify experimental signatures (features in the osmotic pressure, osmotic compressibility, and specific heat) that can be used to locate and quantify the transition rounding in general clustering transitions. The computation of a flattening in the concentration dependence of the osmotic pressure in the one-phase region motivates our consideration of the temperature dependence of the second virial coefficient and the variation of the theta temperature T-theta with sticking energy Delta h as possible important indicators of particle clustering. The ratio of the critical temperature T-c for phase separation to T-theta, along with other critical constant ratios, such as the osmotic compressibility factor Z(c), are also calculated and discussed in connection with establishing criteria for identifying particle clustering transitions and for quantifying the relative strength of these transitions. (C) 2000 American Institute of Physics. [S0021- 9606(00)50825-3].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据