4.7 Article

Physiological and molecular characterization of Fe acquisition by tomato plants from natural Fe complexes

期刊

BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 187-200

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-012-0706-1

关键词

Iron chlorosis; Natural Fe sources; Solanum lycopersicum L.; Humic substances; Fe-59

资金

  1. Italian MIUR (FIRB-Programma Futuro in Ricerca)
  2. Italian MIUR (PRIN)
  3. Free University of Bolzano [TN5031, TN5046]
  4. Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano [Rhizotyr-TN5 218]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work is to evaluate the capability of tomato plants to use different Fe sources, such as Fe citrate, Fe phytosiderophores, and Fe complexed by a water-extractable humic substances (Fe-WEHS) also in relation to physiological and molecular adaptations induced by these complexes at the root level. Tomato plants acquired higher amounts of Fe from Fe-WEHS than from the other two sources and this phenomenon occurred only when the treatment lasted 24 h. The higher acquisition of Fe from Fe-WEHS than other sources depended on a reductive mechanism and on rhizosphere acidification and appeared to be due neither to a higher apoplastic loading nor to a higher resistance of WEHS to microbial degradation. Supply of the different Fe complexes to deficient plants induced a transient upregulation of Fe(III)-chelate reductase (LeFRO1) and Fe transporter genes, LeIRT1 and LeIRT2. In Fe-WEHS-fed plants, where a quicker and higher upregulation of these genes was evident, a coordination in the expression of LeFRO1, LeIRT1, and LeIRT2 genes occurred already after 1 h treatment when the amount of Fe acquired by the plants from the three sources was similar. Iron from Fe-WEHS could be efficiently acquired in a mixture of natural Fe complexes possibly occurring in the rhizosphere. This phenomenon is due to an altered expression of Fe uptake-related genes and to the root capacity to create favorable conditions for the micronutrient uptake into the rhizosphere.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据