4.7 Article

Decomposition of tobacco roots with modified phenylpropanoid content by fungi with contrasting lignocellulose degradation strategies

期刊

BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 305-311

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-012-0720-3

关键词

Chaetomium globosum; Genetic modification; Lignin; Tobacco; Phanerochaete chrysosporium

资金

  1. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council under the Biological Interactions in the Root Environment programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The decomposition of tobacco roots with genetic modifications to lignin biosynthesis by the ligninolytic fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium, by the cellulolytic fungus Chaetomium globosum, and by microbial communities in soil were examined to determine whether the rates of decomposition of the modified and unmodified roots decomposed at different rates, whether the order of colonization by P. chrysosporium and C. globosum facilitated decomposition, and whether the microbial community in soil was conditioned by exposure to roots subsequently so that the subsequent decomposition of the roots was increased. Both P. chrysosporium and C. globosum decomposed the modified roots more rapidly, at least initially, than the unmodified roots. Colonization by P. chrysosporium facilitated the subsequent decomposition by C. globosum, presumably because by degrading lignin, P. chrysosporium increased the susceptibility of the polysaccharide component of root material to attack by C. globosum. Selection of the soil microbial community by exposure to the modified residues accelerated subsequent decomposition of the root modified. Although demonstrating effects of the lignin modification on decomposition, they are relatively subtle and in most cases short-lived (less than 40 days) ones to which the microbial community is able to adapt, and therefore, we conclude that there are unlikely to be any persistent effects of the modified lignin on the soil decomposer community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据