4.7 Article

Long-term renal effects of unilateral ureteral obstruction and the role of endothelin

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 242-250

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00159.x

关键词

bosentan; angiotensin II; captopril; hemodynamics; vasoconstriction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Angiotensin II (Ang II) and endothelin (ET) are involved in the alteration of renal function in unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). The renal response to Ang II following the reversal of a 24-hour UUO and the effect of ET blockade by bosentan during the time of obstruction were investigated. Methods. Following blockade of the endogenous production of Ang II by captopril, the renal response to Ang II was studied in rats 15 to 18 days after a 24-hour UUO (N = 10) or a sham operation (N = 9) both with (N = 10) and without (N = 8) bosentan treatment in the periobstruction period. Similar studies were performed in another group (N = 9) two months following the reversal of obstruction. Results. In the sham-operated group, Ang II reduced renal blood Row (RBF) by 42 +/- 9% (P < 0.01), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by 30 +/- 8% (P < 0.01), urine volume (UV) by 44 +/- 9% (P < 0.001), and absolute (UNaV) and fractional sodium excretion (FENa) by 52 +/- 9% (P < 0.001) and 33 +/- 9% (P = 0.054), respectively. In the previously obstructed kidney, Ang II did not change RBF but increased GFR by 106 +/- 40% (P < 0.01), UV by 75 +/- 21% (P < 0.001), UNaV by 190 +/- 60% (P < 0.001), and FEN, by 40 +/- 13% (P < 0.05). Bosentan treatment in the obstructed group prevented these Ang II-induced effects and did not have any effect on the sham-operated kidney. Two months following reversal of the obstruction, the response of the kidney was similar to that of the control kidney. Conclusion. Twenty-four-hour UUO results in a temporary abnormality in the renal response to Ang II, which is due, in part, to the actions of ET at the time of obstruction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据