4.6 Article

Foliar application of fungal biocontrol agents for the control of white mold of dry bean caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 270-276

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/bcon.2000.0829

关键词

Coniothyrium minitans; Trichoderma virens; Talaromyces flavus; Trichothecium roseum; Epicoccum purpurascens; Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; Phaseolus vulgaris; biological control; mycoparasite; white mold

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Field experiments were conducted during 1992-1994 to evaluate the effectiveness of five indigenous fungi for control of white mold (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), The five fungi consisted of one antagonist, Epicoccum purpurascens, and four mycoparasites, Coniothyrium minitans, Talaromyces flavus, Trichothecium roseum, and Trichoderma vi ens. Spore suspensions of each fungus were sprayed onto bean plants two or three times during the early bloom to midbloom period. Incidence of white mold of dry bean was significantly reduced by all biocontrol agents. C. minitans and E. purpurascens, the most effective agents, reduced the proportion of plants infected by an average of 56 and 43%, respectively (P < 0.001). C. minitans was the only biocontrol agent recovered consistently from sclerotia and diseased seed present in harvested samples. It was recovered at similar frequencies in samples from all treatments. Of the sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum collected from harvested seed, 59% mere infected by C. minitans in 1993 and 20% were infected by C. minitans in 1994. In three additional trials in 1994, comparing C. minitans with the fungicide benomyl, the fungus was not effective in any of the experiments, whereas benomyl reduced disease incidence relative to the control in one trial. The study suggests that, among the five indigenous fungi, C. minitans is the most promising agent for control of white mold of dry bean under Canadian prairie conditions. (C) Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada 2000 and a 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据