4.5 Article

Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of submicron particles

期刊

AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 33, 期 1-2, 页码 49-70

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/027868200410840

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The importance of atmospheric aerosols in regulating the Earth's climate and their potential detrimental impact on air quality and human health has stimulated the need for instrumentation which can provide real-time analysis of size resolved aerosol, mass, and chemical composition, We describe here an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) which has been developed in response to these aerosol sampling needs and present results which demonstrate quantitative measurement capability for a laboratory-generated pure component NH4NO3 aerosol, The instrument combines standard vacuum and mass spectrometric technologies with recently developed aerosol sampling techniques, A unique aerodynamic aerosol inlet (developed at the University of Minnesota) focuses particles into a narrow beam and efficiently transports them into vacuum where aerodynamic particle size is determined via a particle time-of-flight (TOF) measurement, Time-resolved particle mass detection is performed mass spectrometrically following particle flash vaporization on a resistively heated surface, Calibration data are presented for aerodynamic particle velocity and particle collection efficiency measurements, The capability to measure aerosol size and mass distributions is compared to simultaneous measurements using a differential mobility analyzer (DMA) and condensation particle counter (CPC), Quantitative size classification is demonstrated for pure component NH4NO3 aerosols having mass concentrations > similar to 0.25 mu g m(-3), Results of fluid dynamics calculations illustrating the performance of the aerodynamic lens are also presented and compared to the measured performance, The utility of this AMS as both a laboratory and held portable instrument is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据