4.6 Article

In vivo detection of human vascular endothelial growth factor promoter activity in transgenic mouse skin

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 157, 期 1, 页码 103-110

出版社

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64522-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA69184, R01 CA069184] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have generated transgenic mice expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) driven by 2.453-kb (-2,362 to +91) of the 5'-upstream region of the human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promoter to monitor changes of VEGF gene transcription in situ, Neonatal transgenic mice exhibited GFP-derived fluorescence in tissues that have been previously reported to express VEGF mRNA expression, Including lung, cartilage, and brain. In normal skin during postnatal development, moderate fluorescence was observed in the upper epidermis and, more prominently, in the outer root sheath keratinocytes of hair follicles. Strong up-regulation of GFP fluorescence was observed in the hyperplastic epidermis of the wound edge at 48 hours after wounding, whereas little GFP fluorescence was detected iii the dermis, In Situ hybridization confirmed an identical expression pattern of VEGF mRNA in these wounds. Topical application of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) induced strong VEGF-GFP expression in suprabasal epidermis, Little or no fibroblast-derived fluorescence was seen both in the wound model and after TPA application. By confocal laser microscopy, Increased GFP fluorescence was detectable in the epidermis of intact mouse ear skin as early as 6 hours after topical TPA treatment, importantly, GFP fluorescence was also measurable in the skin of living transgenic mice, These results resolve the present controversy regarding the ability of VEGF-GFP transgenic mouse models to correctly reflect established patterns of VEGF expression, and show the model to be a powerful tool for the in vivo monitoring of VEGF gene expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据