4.7 Article

Effects of dietary n-3 fatty acids on contractility, Na+ and K+ currents in a rat cardiomyocyte model of arrhythmia

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 11, 期 7-8, 页码 382-392

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0955-2863(00)00094-2

关键词

ion currents; polyunsaturated fatty acids; reperfusion; docosahexaenoic acid; free radicals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have been reported to prevent ventricular fibrillation in human clinical studies and in studies involving experimental animals and isolated cardiomyocytes. This study aimed to determine whether dietary n-3 PUFAs could prevent isoproterenol and free radical-induced arrhythmic (asynchronous) contractile activity in adult rat cardiomyocytes and whether whole-cell Na+ and K+ currents measured by patch-clamp techniques were affected. Dietary supplementation with fish oil for 3 weeks significantly increased the proportion of total n-3 PUFAs in ventricular membrane phospholipids compared with saturated fat supplementation (18.8 +/- 0/6% vs. 8.1 +/- 1.0%, respectively). Cardiomyocytes from the fish oil group were less susceptible to isoproterenol-induced asynchronous contractile activity than were those from the saturated fat group [EC50 values: 892 +/- 130 nM, n = 6 and 347 +/- 91 nM, n = 6 (P < 0.05), respectively]. Fish oil supplementation also prolonged the time taken to develop asynchronous contractile activity induced by superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. The voltage dependence of inactivation of Na+ currents were significantly altered (-73.5 +/- 1.2 mV, n = 5 vs. -76.7 +/- 0.7 mV, n = 5, P < 0.05, for saturated fat and fish oil treated groups, respectively). The voltage dependence of activation of Na+ and K+ currents was not significantly affected by the dietary fish oil treatment. These results demonstrate the antiarrhythmic effects of dietary fish oil in a cardiomyocyte model of arrhythmia. (J. Nutr. Biochem. 11:381-392, 2000) (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 2000. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据