4.1 Article

A novel affinity ligand for polystyrene surface from a phage display random library and its application in anti-HIV-1 ELISA system

期刊

BIOLOGICALS
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 48-54

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2008.10.002

关键词

Affinity ligand; Phage display random library; Polystyrene surface; HIV-1; ELISA

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20477034]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [08JJ6003]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [06C816]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to develop an affinity ligand for site-directed immobilization of target proteins on polystyrene (PS) surface, a linear 12-mer peptide phage display random library was screened. Phage clones that specifically bound to PS plate were sequenced after three rounds of biopanning. The obtained DNA sequences revealed that there were several aromatic and basic amino acid residues, which may be critical to binding. One of the selected dodecapeptides, named Lig1 (FKFWLYEHVIRG), was genetically fused to the N/C-terminus of recombinant antigen ENV which could be recognized by specific antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), to investigate its performance as an affinity ligand. The ligand-fused ENVs overexpressed in Escherichia coli were compared to the original one in terms of the immobilization characteristics on PS plate in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results indicated that the ligand-fused proteins showed a considerably improved affinity to PS surface, and were preferentially adsorbed on PS plate suffering only scarcely from interference by coexisting protein molecules. Anti-HIV-1 ELISA system, which employed Lig1-ENV (Lig1 fused to ENV N-terminus) as immobilization antigen also exhibited sufficiently high sensitivity and specificity in serodiagnosis tests. (c) 2008 The International Association for Biologicals. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据