4.5 Article

A prospective study on factors influencing aspergillus spore load in the air during renovation works in a neonatal intensive care unit

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 191-197

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2000.0773

关键词

Aspergillus; renovation works; air sampling; air filtration; meteorological factors; nasopharyngeal colonization; neonates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between air contamination (cfu/m(3)) with fungal spores, especially Aspergillus spp., in three renovation areas of a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and colonization and infection rates in a high care area (HC) equipped with high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration and a high pressure system, was evaluated. Data on the type and site of renovation works, outdoor meteorological conditions, patient crowding and nasopharyngeal colonization rate were collected. Factors not associated with Aspergillus spp. concentration were outdoor temperature, air pressure, wind speed, humidity, rainfall, patient density in the NICU, renovation works in the administrative area and in the isolation rooms. Multivariate analysis revealed that rt novation works and air concentration of Aspergillus spp. spores in the medium care area (MC) resulted in a significant increase of the concentration in the HC of the NICU. The use of a mobile HEPA air filtration system (MedicCleanAir(R)Forte, Willebroek, Belgium) caused a significant decrease in the Aspergillus spp. concentration. There was no relationship between Aspergillus spp. air concentration and nasopharyngeal colonization in the neonates. Invasive aspergillosis did not occur during the renovation. This study highlights the importance of optimal physical barriers and air filtration to decrease airborne fungal spores in high-risk units during renovation works. The value of patient surveillance and environmental air sampling is questionable since no relationship was found between air contamination and colonization in patients. (C) 2000 The Hospital Infection Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据