4.2 Article

The serine-aspartate repeat (Sdr) protein family in Staphylococcus epidermidis

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 1535-1546

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-146-7-1535

关键词

surface protein; adhesin; multigene family

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI20624] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Staphylococcus epidermidis can express three different cell-surface-associated proteins, designated SdrF, SdrG and SdrH, that contain serine-aspartate dipeptide repeats. Proteins SdrF and SdrG are similar in sequence and structural organization to the Sdr proteins of Staphylococcus aureus and comprise unique 625- and 548-residue A regions at their N termini, respectively, followed by 110-119-residue B-repeat regions and SO-repeat regions. The C termini contain LPXTG motifs and hydrophobic amino acid segments characteristic of surface proteins covalently anchored to peptidoglycan. In contrast, SdrH has a short 60-residue A region at its N terminus followed by a SO-repeat region, a unique 277-residue C region and a C-terminal hydrophobic segment. SdrH lacks a LPXTG motif. Recombinant proteins representing the A regions of SdrF, SdrG and SdrH were expressed and purified from Escherichia coli. Antisera specific to these proteins were raised in rabbits and used to identify Sdr proteins expressed by S. epidermidis. Only SdrF was released from lysostaphin-generated protoplasts of cells grown to late-exponential phase. SdrG and SdrH remained associated with the protoplast fraction and thus appear to be ineffectively sorted along the conventional pathway used for cell-wall-anchored proteins. In Southern hybridization analyses, the sdrG and sdrH genes were present in all 16 strains tested, whilst sdrF was present in 12 strains. Antisera from 16 patients who had recovered from S. epidermidis infections contained antibodies that reacted with recombinant A regions of SdrG and SdrH, suggesting that these proteins can be expressed during infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据