4.7 Article

Median networks: Speedy construction and greedy reduction, one simulation, and two case studies from human mtDNA

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 8-28

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0792

关键词

median networks; compatibility; human mtDNA; hypervariable segments; heterogeneity of mutation rates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular data sets characterized by few phylogenetically informative characters with a broad spectrum of mutation rates, such as intraspecific control-region sequence variation of human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), can be usefully visualized in the form of median networks, Here we provide a step-by-step guide to the construction of such networks by hand, We improve upon a previously implemented algorithm by outlining an efficient parametrized strategy amenable to large data sets, greedy reduction, which makes it possible to reconstruct some of the confounding recurrent mutations. This entails some postprocessing as well, which assists in capturing more parsimonious solutions. To simplify the creation of the resulting network by hand, we describe a speedy approach to network construction, based on a careful planning of the processing order, A coalescent simulation tailored to human mtDNA variation in Eurasia testifies to the usefulness of reduced median networks, while highlighting notorious problems faced by all phylogenetic methods in this context. Finally, we discuss two case studies involving the comparison of characters in the two hypervariable segments of the human mtDNA control region in the light of the worldwide control-region sequence database, as well as additional restriction fragment length polymorphism information. We conclude that only a minority of the mutations that hit the second segment occur at sites that would have a mutation rate comparable to those at most sites in the first segment. Discarding the known noisy sites of the second segment enhances the analysis. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据