4.6 Article

Haemophilus parainfluenzae antigen and antibody in children with IgA nephropathy and Henoch-Schonlein nephritis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 47-52

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2000.8264

关键词

Haemophilus parainfluenzae; immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy; Henoch-Schonlein nephritis (HSN); children

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the pathogenesis of immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy and Henoch-Schonlein nephritis (HSN) remains uncertain, there is substantial evidence that they are immune complex-mediated diseases. Recently, Haemophilus parainfluenzae antigens were shown in the glomerular mesangium of adult patients with IgA nephropathy, and greater levels of IgA antibody against H parainfluenzae were also shown in the sera of adult patients with IgA nephropathy. The present study was performed to detect H parainfluenzae antigens and antibody against ii parainfluenzae in children with IgA nephropathy and HSN. H parainfluenzae antigens in the mesangium were examined by indirect immunofluorescence, and antibody against H parainfluenzae was examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Diffuse global staining of the mesangium with rabbit antisera against H parainfluenzae was shown in 10 of the 32 patients (31%) with IgA nephropathy and 12 of the 34 patients (35%) with HSN, Conversely, only 2 of the 47 patients (4%) with other renal diseases showed staining of glomeruli with rabbit antisera against H parainfluenzae (IgA nephropathy versus other renal diseases, P = 0.003; HSN versus other renal diseases, P = 0.0006). Patients with IgA nephropathy and those with HSN showed significantly greater levels of plasma IgA1 antibody against H parainfluenzae than patients with other renal diseases (IgA nephropathy versus other renal diseases, P = 0.008; HSN versus other renal diseases, P = 0.025). These findings suggest that H parainfluenzae has a role in the cause of these two conditions in a subset of patients. (C) 2000 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据