4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Prevention of mucosal atrophy: Role of glutamine and caspases in apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 416-423

出版社

QUALITY MEDICAL PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80022-0

关键词

glutamine; intestinal mucosa; apoptosis; caspases

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [KO8 CA64191] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P01 DK35608, F32 DK09867] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glutamine starvation induces apoptosis in enterocytes; therefore glutamine is important in the maintenance of gut mucosal homeostasis. However, the molecular mechanisms are unknown. The caspase family of proteases constitutes the molecular machinery that drives apoptosis. Caspases are selectively activated in a stimulus-specific and tissue-specific fashion. The aims of this study were to (1) identify specific caspases activated by glutamine starvation and (2) determine whether a general caspase inhibitor blocks glutamine starvation-induced apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells. Rat intestinal epithelial (RIE-1) cells were deprived of glutamine. Specific caspase activation was measured using fluorogenic substrate assay. Apoptosis was quantified by DNA fragmentation and Hoechst nuclear staining. Glutamine starvation of RIE-1 cells resulted ill the dme-dependent activation of caspases 3 (10 hours) and 2 (18 hours), and the induction of DNA fragmentation (IZ hours). Caspases I and 8 remained inactive. ZVAD-fluoromethyl 1 ketone, a general caspase inhibitor, completely blocked glutamine starvation-induced caspase activation, DNA fragmentation, and nuclear condensation. These results indicate that glutamine starvation selectively activates specific caspases, which leads to the induction of apoptosis in RIE-1 cells. Furthermore, inhibition of caspase activity blocked the induction of apoptosis, suggesting that caspases are potential molecular targets to attenuate apoptotic responses in the gut.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据