4.4 Article

Long-depth imaging of specific gene expressions in whole-mount mouse embryos with single-photon excitation confocal fluorescence microscopy and FISH

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
卷 131, 期 1, 页码 56-66

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/jsbi.2000.4238

关键词

confocal fluorescence imaging; fluorescence in situ hybridization; whole-mount mouse embryos; single-photon fluorescence excitation; two-photon fluorescence imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-depth imaging of specific gene expression in the midgestation whole-mount mouse embryo (WME) is demonstrated with single-photon excitation (1PE) confocal fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Expression domains of Pax-6 mRNA transcripts were labeled with an in situ hybridization probe that is a RNA sequence complementary to the cloned gene fragment and were rendered visible using two fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies that fluoresce at peak wavelengths of lambda(F) = 0.525 mu m and lambda(F) = 0.580 mu m, respectively. Distributions of Pax-6 mRNA domains as deep as 1000 mu m in the day 9.5 WME were imaged with a long-working-distance (13.6 mm) objective lens (magnification 5x), The scattering problem posed by the optically thick WME sample is alleviated by careful control of the detector pinhole size and the application of simple but fast postdetection image enhancement techniques, such as space and wavelength averaging to produce high-quality fluorescence images. A three-dimensional reconstruction that clearly shows the Pax-6 mRNA expression domains in the forebrain, diencephalon, optic cup, and spinal cord of the day 9.5 WME is obtained. The advantages of 1PE confocal fluorescence imaging over two-photon excitation fluorescence imaging are discussed for the case of long-depth imaging in highly scattering media. Imaging in midgestation WMEs at optical depths of more than 350 mu m has not yet been realized with two-photon fluorescence excitation. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据