4.5 Article

Failure of rIL-12 administration to inhibit established IgE responses in vivo is associated with enhanced IL-4 synthesis by non-B/non-T cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 1025-1034

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/intimm/12.7.1025

关键词

IL-4; IL-12; immediate hypersensitivity; non-B/non-T

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Administration of rIL-12 offers a widely successful tactic for preferential induction of type 1 immune responses in vivo. Its use to modulate ongoing cytokine or effector responses has proven to be substantially more difficult. Immediate hypersensitivity is the most common human immunologic disease. Here, rIL-12 was administered to C57B1/6 and outbred CD1 mice with ongoing ovalbumin (OVA)-specific IgE responses in an attempt to redirect established type 2 cytokine and antibody production. Despite use of a broad range of treatment protocols for >4 months following initial immunization, recall IgE responses were consistently unaffected, rIL-12-treated mice exhibited strong in vivo and in vitro IFN-gamma responses, increased similar to 40-fold relative to controls, but also markedly enhanced (15- to 20-fold) OVA-specific IL-4 production. CD4 T cell function was successfully transformed from a type 2- to a type 1-dominated pattern following longterm IL-12 administration in vivo, as measured by strongly reduced IL-4 and IL-10 responses in antigen-stimulated primary culture, and 5-fold reductions in the frequencies of IL-4- and IL-10-producing OVA-specific CD4 T cells. However, chronically rIL-12-treated mice exhibited increased numbers of non-B/non-T cells that when re-stimulated with specific allergen, produce IL-4 at levels 20-fold higher than did CD4 T cells while IL-13 responses are unaffected, Collectively, the data indicate that even effectively shifting CD4 T cell activation from a type 2- to a type 1-dominated response does not in itself lead to altered effector (IgE) responses upon antigen re-exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据