4.7 Article

Reduced prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and no change in prevalence ol diabetes despite increasing BMI among aboriginal people from a group of remote homeland communities

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 898-904

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.898

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - To examine trends in glucose tolerance and coronary risk among Aboriginal people from a group of homeland communities in central Australia during a 7-year follow-up period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Community-based screenings of adult volunteers were performed in 1988 (n = 437; 93% response rate) and in 1995 (n = 424; 85% response rate). A health promotion intervention program commenced after the 1988 survey that focused on the benefits of exercise and appropriate diet. RESULTS - Mean (95% CI) BMI increased significantly from 22.8 kg/m(2) (22.3-23.2) to 24.2 kg/m(2) (23.8-24.7) during the follow-up period (P < 0.001). This increase was similar for men and women and across all age-groups. The increase in BMI was greater among subjects residing adjacent to a store compared with those residing in communities located far from a store (P < 0.001). Decreases were evident in the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (from 22.5 to 10.1% among women, P < 0.001; from 12.2 to 6.5% among men, P = 0.074) and hypercholesterolemia (from 36.7 to 25.8% among women, P < 0.01; from 52.4 to 44.0% among men, P = 0.147), but no change was evident in the prevalence of diabetes. Smoking remained rare among women (<4%) and decreased among men (from 52.9 to 40.8%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS - The trends in glucose intolerance were clearly better than have been observed in other Aboriginal communities. The institution of an intervention program corresponded with reductions in the prevalence of IGT, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking. The prevalence of diabetes remained unaltered despite a significant increase in mean BMI, possibly because of the promotion of increased physical activity levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据