4.5 Article

Role of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) and its natural ligand 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 in the regulation of microglial functions

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 2215-2223

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00110.x

关键词

brain macrophages; iNOS; MHC class II; NF-kappa B; STAT-1; TNF-alpha

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) is a member of a large group of nuclear receptors controlling the proliferation of peroxisomes that is involved in the downregulation of macrophage functions. Here, we report that PPAR-gamma was constitutively expressed in rat primary microglial cultures and that such expression was downregulated during microglial activation by endotoxin (LPS). The presence of the PPAR-gamma natural ligand 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) (15d-PGJ(2)) counteracted the repression of PPAR-gamma expression caused by LPS. In microglial cultures stimulated by LPS, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or by their combination, 15d-PGJ(2) reduced the production of nitric oxide (NO) and the expression of inducible NO synthase (iNOS). The inhibitory effect was dose-dependent and did not involve an elevation of cyclic AMP, a second messenger known to inhibit NOS expression in microglia. In addition, 15d-PGJ(2) down-regulated other microglial functions, such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) synthesis and major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC class II) expression. The effects of 15d-PGJ(2) occurred, at least in part, through the repression of two important transcription factors, the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and the nuclear factor kappa B, known to mediate IFN-gamma and LPS cell signalling. Our observations suggest that 15d-PGJ(2), the synthesis of which is likely to occur within the brain, could play an important role in preventing brain damage associated with excessive microglial activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据