3.8 Article

Transvenous occlusion of dural cavernous sinus fistulas through the thrombosed inferior petrosal sinus: Report of four cases and review of the literature

期刊

SURGICAL NEUROLOGY
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 42-54

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-3019(00)00260-3

关键词

dural cavernous sinus fistula; transvenous embolization; inferior petrosal sinus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to describe the technique and results of the endovascular approach through the thrombosed inferior petrosal sinus (IPS) for occlusion of dural cavernous sinus fistulas (DCSFs). METHODS In four patients presenting with clinically symptomatic DCSFs, the angiogram did not show opacification of the IFS, indicating that it neither drained the arteriovenous fistula nor the cerebral venous outflow. A large volume biplane phlebogram of the jugular bulb was obtained to identify a thrombosed remnant of the IFS. We were able to navigate small hydrophilic catheters and microguide wires through the thrombosed IFS into the ipsi- or contralateral CS. After reaching the fistula site the CS was packed with detachable platinum coils. RESULTS We were able to reach the fistula site and to achieve a dense packing of coils within the arteriovenous shunting zone in all of the patients. The final angiogram showed subtotal or complete occlusion of the arteriovenous fistula. All four patients recovered completely and showed disappearance of the fistula on follow-up arteriograms. One patient developed a transient sixth nerve palsy. No complications related to the approach were observed. CONCLUSIONS For endovascular treatment, transvenous occlusion of DCSFs via the IFS is a feasible approach, even when this sinus is partially or completely thrombosed. Gentle handling of recently available, improved hydrophilic microguide wires and microcatheters allows effective and safe catheter navigation into the CS. A phlebogram of the jugular bulb is very useful for identification of a thrombosed IFS. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据