4.4 Article

Prevalence of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema in 13- to 14-year-old children in Kuwait: an ISAAC study

期刊

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
卷 85, 期 1, 页码 58-63

出版社

AMER COLL ALLERGY ASTHMA IMMUNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62435-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of asthma and allergic diseases in 13 to 14 years old children in Kuwait. Design: Supervised self-administered written and video questionnaires of the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood (ISAAC). Subjects: Students at third and fourth years from 40 intermediate level schools chosen randomly from across Kuwait. Results: 3,110 students were surveyed. The prevalence rates (95% CI) in the written questionnaire for wheeze ever, current wheeze (within the last 12 months), and physician diagnosis of asthma are 25.9% (24.5 to 27.4), 16.1% (15.8 to 17.4), and 16.8% (15.5 to 18.1)respectively. The prevalence rates (95% CI) for symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR) ever, current symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR), and diagnosis of AR are 43.9% (42.2 to 45.6), 30.7% (29.1 to 32.4) and 17.1% (14.8 to 18.4) respectively. The prevalence rates (95% CI) for itchy rash ever, current itchy rash, and diagnosis of eczema are 17.5% (16.2 to 18.8), 12.6% (11.4 to 13.8), and 11.3% (10.2 to 12.4) respectively. The prevalence of wheeze ever, wheeze during the last year, and physician diagnosis of asthma are higher in males compared with females, P < .01. In multiple logistic regression: male gender (OR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.0) and diagnosis of AR (OR 1.7, 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.2) were associated with the physician diagnosis of asthma even after controlling for symptoms of asthma. Conclusion: This is the first study on the prevalence of allergic diseases in Kuwait and it shows that children in Kuwait have a moderate prevalence of asthma, AR, and eczema compared with other countries where the ISAAC study is done. The prevalence of asthma is higher in boys compared with girls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据