4.7 Article

How urine analysis reflects oxidative stress -: nitrotyrosine as a potential marker

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 297, 期 1-2, 页码 207-216

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-8981(00)00247-3

关键词

reactive oxygen species; reactive nitrogen species; superoxide dismutase; nitration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhanced oxidant stress involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular (heart failure, atherosclerosis, ischemia-reperfusion injury), neurodegenerative (M. Alzheimer), metabolic (hyper-cholesterolemia, diabetes) and inflammatory disorders is mimicked by non-intermittent therapy with nitrovasodilators. We used this latter therapy model to study urinary 3-nitrotyrosine (n-tyr) excretion as a potential biomarker that may reflect the enhanced generation of reactive oxygen species. Namely, free or protein-bound n-tyr is formed in the organism by nitration of tyrosine (residues) via peroxynitrite (reaction product of NO . and O-2.). Free n-tyr content was analyzed by gas chromatography in urine obtained from healthy human subjects under a nitrite-limited diet during a two-day non-intermittent transdermal administration of glyceroltrinitrate (GTN; 0.4 mg/h) with or without vitamin C (Vit-C; 55 mu g/kg/min) as antioxidant. Concomitant with the development of complete vascular tolerance (loss of dilator action), a progressive increase in urinary n-tyr excretion (up to 186+/-9 mu g/day) was demonstrated in volunteers given GTN only. In contrast, when Vit-C was added, the GTN-induced increases in urinary n-tyr content were significantly suppressed (up to 130.20+/-6.91 mu g/day), whereas Vit-C alone even decreased urinary a-tyr content (down to 34.00+/-5.66 mu g/day), which was below control values (56.0+/-3.4 mu g/day). Thus, urinary n-tyr may serve as a biomarker to detect changes in oxidant stress and thereby to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing oxidant stress under various pathophysiological conditions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据