4.3 Article

Growth, body composition, and nutritional status in children and adolescents with Crohn's disease

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005176-200007000-00009

关键词

adolescents; anthropometry; body composition; children; Crohn's disease; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; gender; growth

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-00240] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine growth. body composition, and nutritional status in a large sample of children, adolescents, and young adults with Crohn's disease (CD). Methods: One hundred thirty-two subjects (48 females) with CD. aged 5 to 25 years, and 66 healthy control subjects (37 females) of similar age. Growth, nutritional status, and body composition were measured by anthropometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Genetic potential of linear growth was predicted using the adjusted heights of Himes et al. Pubertal status and skeletal age were assessed. Average Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) and lifetime steroid exposure tin milligrams per day) were obtained from medical charts. The variables were examined in relation to gender and measures of disease activity. Results: Males and females with CD did not differ by age, disease duration, or PCDAI. Males with CD had significantly lower values for growth and nutritional status than control subjects (z-scores for weight: -0.66 +/- 1.18 vs. 0.26 +/- 0.95, P = 0.00002; height -0.81 +/- 1.14 vs. 0.28 +/- 0.93, P = 0.00001; adjusted height -1.05 +/- 1.03 vs. 0.40 +/- 1.03, P = 0.00001) and delayed skeletal age of 0.9 +/- 1.6 years. Impaired linear growth in the males was present regardless of pubertal stage. Associations between disease severity indicators and growth parameters were more consistent for females. Conclusions: Crohn's disease is associated with impaired growth. Despite similarities in disease duration, activity, and lifetime steroid exposure, growth in males was more impaired. Gender may confer risk for impaired growth in CD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据