4.8 Article

Hepatic cytochrome P450 down-regulation during aseptic inflammation in the mouse is interleukin 6 dependent

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 49-55

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2000.8532

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expression of cytochromes P450 (CYP) is markedly reduced during inflammatory processes. In vitro studies with hepatocytes have shown that cytokines generated during these processes down-regulate CYP However, it is not clear to what extent each individual cytokine contributes to the overall reduced expression of the various CYP isoenzymes in vivo. Interleukin 6 (IL-6), a major player during inflammatory processes, is recognized as the most important cytokine modulating the hepatic expression of acute-phase protein (APP) genes. For this reason, we selected the IL-6(-/-) mouse as a model to investigate the role of IL-6 in the down-regulation of hepatic CYP during experimental inflammation. Our results show that the reduction in messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of CYP1A2, CYP2A5, and CYP3A11 during turpentine-induced inflammation was abrogated in IL-6-deficient mice, confirming that IL-6 is an indispensable player for the down-regulation of hepatic CYP during aseptic inflammation, Moreover, the different CYP isoenzymes showed a variable grade of dependence on IL-6, CYP2A5 being the most sensitive one. In the case of CYP2E1, differences between IL-6-/- and wild-type mice were no longer maintained after 24 hours, suggesting a delayed, rather than abrogated, CYP downregulation in the absence of IL-6. As opposed to that, hepatic CYP repression took place in IL-6-deficient mice during lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated inflammation. This contrasting behavior observed for CYP is surprisingly similar to the one seen for extracellular (serum amyloid A, P-fibrinogen) and intracellular (metallothionein-l) APPs and points to the fact that, in the model of bacterial inflammation (LPS), the effects of IL-6 on CYP downregulation are likely to be substituted by other cytokines or mediators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据