4.8 Article

Spatial variations in total aluminum concentrations in drinking water supplies studied by geographic information system (GIS) methods

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 34, 期 10, 页码 2703-2712

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00026-9

关键词

aluminum; water supply; water treatment; geographic information system methods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aluminum sulfate (alum) is routinely added in many water treatment systems as a coagulant. Some amount of aluminum may persist in the filtered water designated for human consumption. However, there are no reliable data to predict the magnitude of residual concentrations that would reach consumers' taps. Studies in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Japan associated aluminum in tap water with various health problems, most notably, neuro-skeletal disorders and cognitive impairments. Whether or not aluminum in the drinking water is, indeed, a risk factor for these diseases has not been resolved conclusively. However, evidence has accumulated to suggest that it might be prudent to minimize residual aluminum in drinking water supplies. Harris County, Texas, by virtue of its multiple water supply sources and treatment methods, provides a unique opportunity to study spatial variations in concentrations of aluminum in the tap water within a defined geographic location. Statistical analysis of sampling results, coupled with GIS mapping, showed a range of variations, from none detected to as much as 530 mu g/l of total aluminum in tap water. Peak concentrations were associated with source water treated with alum and were 2.5 times in excess of 200 mu g/l currently recommended for public drinking water supplies. Median concentrations in the alum-treated water were up to five times greater than in raw water, regardless of its origin (surface or ground), and greater than in the water treated with an alternative coagulant (ferric chloride). Our findings show that options exist to minimize residual aluminum and these options need to be explored. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据