4.5 Article

Improved production and function of llama heavy chain antibody fragments by molecular evolution

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 80, 期 3, 页码 261-270

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00274-1

关键词

heavy chain antibody; molecular evolution; DNA-shuffling; stability; production; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to improve production level of llama heavy chain antibody fragments (V-HH) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae while retaining functional characteristics. For this purpose, the DNA shuffling technique was used on llama V-HH fragments specific for the ate-dye reactive red-6. In the DNA shuffling process, three parental llama V-HH with high amino acid sequence identity with significant differences in production and functional characteristics were used. From these parental sequences, a S. cerevisiae library was created and 16 antigen specific shuffled V-HH fragments were selected. We found that these shuffled V-HH fragments were, (i) unique in sequence; (ii) composed of two or three parental sequences; (iii) in three V(HH)s point mutations occurred; and (iv) antigen specificity was not changed. The four highest producers in the yeast S. cerevisiae were selected and production, affinity, and antigen binding at 90 degrees C were compared with parental V(HH)s. One shuffled V-HH was enhanced both in production (3.4-fold) and affinity (four-fold). A second shuffled V-HH displayed increased production (1.9-fold), and improved stability (2.4-fold) in antigen binding at 90 degrees C. Structural analysis suggested that improved antigen binding is associated with the A24 --> V24 substitution, which reduces the size of the hydrophobic pit at the llama V-HH surface. We demonstrate that it is possible to improve desired characteristics of the same V-HH fragment simultaneously using DNA shuffling. Finally, this is one of the first examples of DNA shuffling improving temperature stability of an antibody fragment. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据