4.5 Article

Nerve growth factor and Neurotrophin-3 modulate the rabies infection of adult sensory neurons in primary cultures

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 871, 期 1, 页码 120-126

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02408-2

关键词

rabies virus; adult mouse; sensory neuron; neurotrophin; image analysis; dorsal root ganglia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the aim of determining if the proportion of rabies virus (RV)-infected adult neurons from dorsal root ganglion are affected by in vitro treatment with different neurotrophins, experiments using Nerve Growth Factor (NGF), Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) or Neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) as supplements for cells in culture were performed. Cultures treated with three different concentrations of each of the neurotrophins mentioned were infected with Challenge Virus Standard RV strain. An indirect immunoperoxidase technique was performed for the detection and counting of infected cells. NGF (2 ng ml(-1) and 10 ng ml(-1)) and NT-3 (1 ng ml(-1) and 5 ng ml(-1)) induced a significant reduction of infected neurons. None of the cultures treated with BDNF showed changes in the percentage of infected neurons. Likewise, the proportion of infected non-neuronal cells (Schwann cells and fibroblasts) was not altered by the treatment with neurotrophins. In addition, morphometric analysis of total and virus-immunoreactive neurons in culture were carried out, the neurotrophin treatment induced variations in the profile of neurons preferentially infected, since cell diameters in the infected cell population are different in the presence of NGF and NT-3. Data presented here could indicate a putative participation of neurotrophin receptor or biochemical modifications induced by neurotrophin treatment that affect the infection. The primary culture of dorsal root ganglion cells from adult mice is a very useful model for studying the basic phenomena of the RV-neuron interaction. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据