4.8 Article

Visualisation of cell death in vivo in patients with acute myocardial infarction

期刊

LANCET
卷 356, 期 9225, 页码 209-212

出版社

LANCET LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02482-X

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In-vivo visualisation and quantification of the extent and time-frame of cell death after acute myocardial infarction would be of great interest. We studied in-vivo cell death in the hearts of patients with an acute myocardial infarction using imaging with technetium-99m-labelled annexin-V-a protein that binds to cells undergoing annexin-V-a apoptosis. Methods Seven patients with an acute myocardial infarction and one control were studied. All patients were treated by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (six primary and one rescue), resulting in thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) III flow of the infarct-related artery. 2 h after reperfusion, 1 mg annexin-V labelled with 584 MBq Tc-99m was injected intravenously. Early (mean 3.4 h) and late (mean 20.5 h) single-photon-emission computed tomo graphic (SPECT) images of the heart were obtained. Routine myocardial resting-perfusion imaging was also done to verify infarct localisation. Findings In six of the seven patients, increased uptake of Tc-99m-labelled annexin-V was seen in the infarct area of the heart on early and late SPECT images. No increased uptake was seen in the heart outside the infarct area. All patients with increased Tc99m-labelled annexin-V uptake in the infarct area showed a matching perfusion defect, in a control individual, no increased uptake in the heart was seen. Interpretation Increased uptake of Tc-99m-labelled annexin-V is present in the infarct area of patients with an acute myocardial infarction, suggesting that programmed cell death occurs in that area. The annexin-V imaging protocol might allow us to study the dynamics of reperfusion-induced cell death in the area at risk and may help to assess interventions that inhibit cell death in patients with an acute myocardial infarction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据