4.6 Article

Chlorophyllin suppression of lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric oxide production in RAW 264.7 cells

期刊

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
卷 166, 期 2, 页码 120-127

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/taap.2000.8958

关键词

chlorophyllin; nitric oxide; lipopolysaccharide; NF-kappa B

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlorophyllin (CHL), a water-soluble derivative of chlorophyll, functions as an anticarcinogen and antioxidant. In the present study, we investigated the effect of CHL on nitric oxide production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Treatment with CHL inhibited nitric oxide production in the LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells in a dose-related manner. Competitive RT-PCR analysis, using a DNA competitor as an internal standard, demonstrated that the treatment with 1, 10, and 50 mu M CHL decreased LPS-induced iNOS mRNA expression in a concentration-dependent manner. Since the expression of the iNOS gene is mainly regulated by NF-kappa B, we then examined the effects of CHL on the NF-kappa B DNA binding activity, using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. CHL down-regulated the NF-kappa B DNA binding on its cognate recognition site at the concentrations just noted. Employing a transfection and reporter gene expression system with p(NF-kappa B)(3)-chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT), the treatment of CHL produced a dose-dependent inhibition of CAT activity in RAW 264.7 cells. Furthermore, CHL partially restored LPS-decreased I kappa B alpha, an inhibitory protein against NF-kappa B activation, in the cytosolic extract from the LPS-treated cells determined by immunoblot analysis. CHL also protected the hydroxyl radical-induced cytotoxicity in RAW 264.7 cells, indicating its antioxidant effect. These results suggest that CHL suppresses the nitric oxide production and iNOS mRNA expression mediated by the inhibition of NF-kappa B activation, and its action mechanism may be based on its antioxidant effect. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据