4.7 Article

Human EMR2, a novel EGF-TM7 molecule on chromosome 19p13.1, is closely related to CD97

期刊

GENOMICS
卷 67, 期 2, 页码 188-200

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/geno.2000.6238

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The epidermal growth factor (EGF)-TM7 proteins [EMR1, (EGF-like molecule containing mucin-like hormone receptor 1) F4/80, and CD97] constitute a recently defined class B GPCR subfamily and are predominantly expressed on leukocytes. These molecules possess N-terminal EGF-like domains coupled to a seven-span transmembrane (7TM) moiety via a mucin-like spacer domain. Genomic mapping analysis has suggested a possible EGF-TM7 gene family on the human chromosome 19p13 region. In this study, a new member of the EGF-TM7 family, EMR2, which shares strikingly similar molecular characteristics with CD97, is described. In addition to mapping closely to CD97 on human chromosome 19p13.1, EMR2 contains a total of five tandem EG;F-like domains and expresses similar protein isoforms consisting of various numbers of EGF-Like domains as a result of alternative RNA splicing. Furthermore, EMR2 and CD97 exhibit highly homologous EGF-like domains and share identical gene organization, indicating that both genes are the products of a recent gene duplication event. The homologous EGF-like domains enable the identification of both EMR2 and CD97 by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) raised against the first EGF-like domain of CD97, whereas mAbs directed against the extracellular spacer domain of CD97 are able to differentiate these two proteins. Both EMR2 and CD97 are highly expressed in immune tissues; however, unlike CD97, which is ubiquitously expressed in most cell types, EMR2 expression is restricted to monocytes/M phi and granulocytes. EMR2 fails to interact with CD55, the cellular ligand for CD97, suggesting the possibility of a different cellular ligand(s). EMR2 may therefore have a unique function in cells of monocyte/M phi and granulocyte lineages. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据