4.8 Article

CTXφ contains a hybrid genome derived from tandemly integrated elements

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.140109997

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-42347, R01 AI042347, R37 AI042347] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK034928, P30DK-34928] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM20483-01, F32 GM020483, R01 GM020483] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CTX phi is a filamentous. temperate bacteriophage whose genome includes ctxAB, the genes that encode cholera toxin. In toxigenic isolates of Vibrio cholerae. tandem arrays of prophage DNA. usually interspersed with the related genetic element RS1, are integrated site-specifically within the chromosome. We have discovered that these arrays routinely yield hybrid virions, composed of DNA from two adjacent prophages or from a prophage and a downstream RS1. Coding sequences are always derived from the 5' prophage whereas most of an intergenic sequence, intergenic region 1, is always derived from the 3' element. The presence of tandem elements is required for production of virions: V. cholerae strains that contain a solitary prophage rarely yield CTX virions. and the few virions detected result from imprecise excision of prophage DNA. Thus, generation of the replicative form of CTX phi, pCTX, a step that precedes production of virions, does not depend on reversal of the process for site-specific integration of CTX phi DNA into the V. cholerae chromosome. Production of pCTX also does not depend on RecA-mediated homologous recombination between adjacent prophages. We hypothesize that the CTX phi-specific proteins required for replication of pCTX can also function on a chromosomal substrate, and that, unlike the processes used by other integrating phages, production of pCTX and CTX phi does not require excision of the prophage from the chromosome. Use of this replication strategy maximizes vertical transmission of prophage DNA while still enabling dissemination of CTX phi to new hosts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据