4.7 Article

Role of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and fibronectin connecting segment-1 in monocyte rolling and adhesion on early atherosclerotic lesions

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 153-159

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.87.2.153

关键词

atherosclerosis; monocyte; fibronectin; connecting segment-1; vascular cell adhesion molecule-1

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-58108] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atherosclerotic lesion development seems to be inflammatory in nature and involves the recruitment of monocytes to the vessel wall. In this study, we investigated the role of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and fibronectin (FN) connecting segment-1 containing the amino acid sequence ILDV as functional ligands for alpha(4)beta(1) integrin (VLA-4) in monocyte rolling and adherence to early atherosclerotic lesions. Carotid arteries of apolipoprotein E-deficient mice were isolated and perfused with monocytes or U937 cells. Cell adhesion was reduced 95+/-4% by monoclonal antibodies HP1/2 and HP2/1, which block VLA-4 binding to both VCAM-1 and FN connecting segment-1. mAb HP1/3 preferentially blocked interaction of VLA-4 with FN but not VCAM-1 and decreased adhesion by 30+/-8%. In contrast, blocking VCAM-1 by perfusing the isolated carotid artery with mAb MK-2.7 reduced adhesion by 75+/-12%. Mononuclear cell adhesion to the early atherosclerotic endothelium was inhibited by 68+/-10% in the presence of EILDVPST but not in the presence of control peptide EIDVLPST. When VLA-4 or VCAM-1 was blocked, more mononuclear cells rolled on early lesions at significantly higher (approximately doubled) rolling velocities. These data demonstrate that (I) blockade of VCAM-1 can abrogate the majority (75+/-12%) of VLA-4-dependent monocyte adhesion on early atherosclerotic endothelia and (2) ILDV peptide interferes with VLA-4 binding to both VCAM-1 and FN and may be useful in limiting monocyte adhesion to atherosclerotic lesions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据