4.0 Article

Do patients with suspected heart failure and preserved left ventricular systolic function suffer from diastolic heart failure or from misdiagnosis? A prospective descriptive study

期刊

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 321, 期 7255, 页码 215-218

出版社

BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7255.215

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To characterise the clinical features of patients with suspected heart failure but preserved left ventricular systolic function to determine if they have other potential causes for their symptoms rather than being diagnosed with diastolic heart failure. Design Prospective descriptive study. Setting Outpatient based direct access echocardiography service. Participants 159 consecutive patients with suspected heart failure referred by general practitioners. Main outcome measures Symptoms (including shortness of breath, ankle oedema, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea) and history of coronary heart disease and chronic pulmonary disease. Transthoracic echocardiography, body mass index, pulmonary function tests, and electrocardiography. Results 109 of 159 participants had suspected heart failure in the absence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, valvular heart disease, or atrial fibrillation. Of these 109, 40 were either obese or very obese, 54 had a reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second to less than or equal to 70%, and 97 had a peak expiratory flow rate less than or equal to 70% of normal. Thirty one patients had a history of angina, 12 had had a myocardial infarction, and seven had undergone a coronary artery bypass graft. Only seven patients lacked a recognised explanation for their symptoms. Conclusions For most patients with a diagnosis of heart failure but preserved left ventricular systolic function there is an alternative explanation for their symptoms-for example, obesity, lung disease, and myocardial ischaemia-and the diagnosis of diastolic heart failure is rarely needed These alternative diagnoses should be rigorously sought and managed accordingly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据