4.5 Article

Hoxb-5 control of early airway formation during branching morphogenesis in the developing mouse lung

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
卷 1475, 期 3, 页码 337-345

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4165(00)00087-8

关键词

homeobox gene; Hoxb-5; retinoic acid; antisense oligonucleotide; lung development; branching morphogenesis

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 37930, R01 HL037930] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hox proteins control structural morphogenesis, pattern formation and cell fate in the developing embryo. To determine if Hoxb-5 participates in patterning of early airway branching during lung morphogenesis, gestational day 11.5 embryonic lung cultures were treated with retinoic acid (RA) to up-regulate and antisense oligonucleotides to down-regulate Hoxb-5 protein expression. RA (10(-6) M) and Hoxb-5 antisense oligonucleotide (20 mu M) treatment each significantly decreased branching morphogenesis (P < 0.001), but the morphology of branching under these conditions was very different. RA-treated lungs had elongated primary branches but decreased further branching with increased Hoxb-5 immunostaining in subepithelial regions underlying these elongated airways. Western blots confirmed that Hoxb-5 protein was increased by 189 +/- 20% (mean +/- S.E.M., P < 0.05) in RA-treated lungs compared to controls. In contrast, lungs treated with Hoxb-5 antisense oligos plus RA had foreshortened primary branches with rudimentary distal clefts resulting in decreased numbers of primary and subsequent branches. Immunohistochemistry confirmed that Hoxb-5 antisense oligos inhibited Hoxb-5 protein expression even in the presence of RA. We conclude that regional and quantitative changes in Hoxb-5 protein expression influence morphogenesis of the first airway divisions from the mainstem bronchi. RA-induced alterations in branching are mediated in part through regulated Hoxb-5 expression. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据