4.5 Article

Influence of hydrophilicity of cationic polymers on the biophysical properties of polyelectrolyte complexes formed by self-assembly with DNA

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
卷 1475, 期 3, 页码 245-255

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4165(00)00076-3

关键词

DNA; gene therapy; gene delivery; polyelectrolyte complex; phagocytosis; poly[2-(trimethylammonio)ethyl methacrylate chloride]; N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide; reticulo endothelial system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the possibility of producing charge-neutral gene delivery complexes with extended, non-particulate structures, DNA was allowed to self-assemble with a series of hydrophilic cationic polymers containing quaternary charged trimethylammonio ethylmethacrylate (TMAEM, 5, 15, 50, 100 mol%) copolymerised with hydrophilic N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA, 95, 85, 50, 0 mol%, respectively). Copolymers were all able to bind DNA, assessed using ethidium bromide fluorescence, although copolymers with low TMAEM content did not expel ethidium bromide. Increasing TMAEM content of the copolymers changed the morphology of the complexes from extended (5-15 mol% TMAEM), through partially condensed particles (50 mol%) to discrete nanoparticles (100 mol% TMAEM). Complexes based on copolymers with low TMAEM content (5-50 mol%) showed less resistance to degradation by nucleases and lower surface charge (21.2+/-5.9-45.1+/-3.9 mV) than those formed using 100 mol% TMAEM (57.8+/-8.2 mV). They also showed significantly less association with phagocytic cells in vitro (human leucocytes, uptake decreased by up to 92.3%; murine peritoneal macrophages, uptake decreased by up to 69.6%), although in vivo their hepatic accumulation was only slightly decreased (maximum decrease 27.6%). Finding the appropriate balance of hydrophilicity and stability is key to development of effective vectors for gene delivery. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据