4.4 Article

N-glycan patterns of human transferrin produced in Trichoplusia ni insect cells:: effects of mammalian galactosyltransferase

期刊

GLYCOBIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 837-847

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/glycob/10.8.837

关键词

baculovirus; glycosylation; glycosyltransferase; oligosaccharide; expression

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM049734] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The N-glycans of human serum transferrin produced in Trichopulsia ni cells were analyzed to examine N-linked oligosaccharide processing in insect cells. Metabolic radiolabeling of the intra- and extracellular protein fractions revealed the presence of multiple transferrin glycoforms with molecular weights lower than that observed for native human transferrin, Consequently, the N-glycan structures of transferrin in the culture medium were determined using three-dimensional high performance liquid chromatography. The attached oligosaccharides included high mannose, paucimannosidic, and hybrid structures with over 50% of these structures containing one fucose, alpha(1,6)-, or two fucoses, alpha(1,6)- and alpha(1,3)-, linked to the Asn-linked N-acetylglucosamine. Neither sialic acid nor galactose was detected on any of the N-glycans, However, when transferrin was coexpressed with beta(1,4)-galactosyltransferase three additional galartose-containing hybrid oligosaccharides were obtained. The galactose attachments were exclusive to the alpha(1,3)-mannose branch and the structures varied by the presence of zero, one, or two attached fucose residues. Furthermore, the presence of the galactosyltransferase appeared to reduce the number of paucimannosidic structures, which suggests that galactose attachment inhibits the ability of hexosaminidase activity to remove the terminal N-acetylglucosamine The ability to promote galactosylation and reduce paucimannosidic N-glycans suggests that the oligosaccharide processing pathway in insect cells mag be manipulated to mimic more closely that of mammalian cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据