4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Intratumoral microvessel density predicts local treatment failure of radically irradiated squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00573-3

关键词

head and neck cancer; radiotherapy; predictive factor; angiogenesis; microvessel density

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine the predictive value of intratumoral microvessel density (IMD), and of the expression of p53, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) for the radiocurability of patients with squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx. Materials and Methods: 139 patients with squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx were radically irradiated (median dose, 74 Gy) between 1991 and 1997. Biopsies from 100 patients were processed for immunohistochemistry, IMD was determined in hot spot areas of tissue stained with anti-CD31 at a magnification of x 200, Staining for p53 was considered positive if more than 10% of the cell nuclei overexpressed the protein. Immunostaining of VEGF and TSP-1 was assessed semiquantitatively. Results: Increasing IMD (range, 54-282) was strongly correlated with incomplete remission of both the primary tumors (p = 0.01) and lymph node metastases (p = 0.02). Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed local failure-free survival to decline with increasing IMD (IMD continuous: risk ratio = 1.01 per increase of 1 microvessel, p = 0.0001; IMD categorical: less than or equal to 80: baseline, 81-110: risk ratio = 2.71, 111-130: risk ratio = 4.55, > 130: risk ratio = 13.01). Neither the expression of p53, nor that of VEGF or TSP-1 was associated with the treatment outcome or IMD, but VEGF and TSP-1 expression were positively correlated (p = 0.02). Conclusion: IMD represents a powerful and independent predictive factor for local treatment failure in radically irradiated patients with squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据