Interaction of therapeutic process and alliance during psychological assessment

Utilizing a collaborative therapeutic assessment (TA) model proposed by Finn and Tonsager (1997), we examined the interaction between therapeutic alliance and in-session process during the assessment phase of treatment. This study compares the utility of the TA model (n = 38) versus a traditional information gathering model (n = 90) of assessment. The results of this study indicate that the use of a TA model may decrease the number of patients who terminate treatment against medical advice. The Session Evaluation Questionnaire (Stiles & Snow, 1984), Combined Alliance Short Form (Watcher & Barends. 1996), and Penn Helping Alliance Questionnaire-Revised (Barber & Crits-Christoph, 1996) call reliably measure the patient's experience of the assessment. The psychological assessment process may impact the patient's experience of assessment feedback and aid in the development of a therapeutic alliance. The therapeutic alliance developed during the assessment wits found to be related to alliance early in psychotherapy. We discuss the theoretical, clinical, and research implications of these findings.