4.6 Article

Dorsal root section elicits signs of neuropathic pain rather than reversing them in rats with L5 spinal nerve injury

期刊

PAIN
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 213-219

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00285-2

关键词

spinal nerve lesion; neuropathic pain behavior; pain mechanisms; dorsal root; rhizotomy; allodynia; hyperalgesia; deafferentation; ectopic activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanical allodynia- and hyperalgesia-like behavior which develops in rats after L5 spinal nerve lesion has been suggested to be due to ectopic activity in the lesioned afferent neurons originating at the lesion site and/or in the dorsal root ganglion because it is eliminated by section of the dorsal root. Here we reevaluated the effect of a dorsal rhizotomy in rats after L5 spinal nerve lesion. Using calibrated von Prey hairs, paw withdrawal threshold to single stimuli and paw withdrawal incidence to repetitive stimulation were tested before and after nerve section. Neuropathic pain behavior of similar time course and magnitude also developed after cutting the L5 dorsal root, and L5 spinal nerve lesion-induced abnormal behavior could not be reversed by dorsal rhizotomy. The neuropathic pain behavior elicited by dorsal root section also developed when impulse conduction in the dorsal root axons was blocked during rhizotomy by a local anesthetic, i.e. when the immediate injury discharge was prevented from reaching the spinal cord. These results challenge the widely accepted idea that neuropathic pain behavior developing after spinal nerve lesion is dependent on ectopic activity in the lesioned afferent neurons. However, the present results do not rule out the possibility that after the two nerve lesions the mechanisms generating neuropathic pain behavior are different. After dorsal rhizotomy neuropathic pain behavior may be related to deafferentation whereas after spinal nerve lesion it may be caused by ectopic activity. (C) 2000 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据