4.7 Article

Cortical Volume, Surface Area, and Thickness in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 71, 期 6, 页码 552-560

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.11.026

关键词

Bipolar disorder; cortex; cortical area; FreeSurfer; psychosis; schizophrenia

资金

  1. South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority [2004-123, 2008011, 2009037]
  2. Research Council of Norway [190311/V50, 167153/V50]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging studies have shown that structural brain abnormalities are present in both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Most previous studies have focused on brain tissue volumes, but advances in neuroimaging data processing have made it possible to separate cortical area and cortical thickness. The purpose of the present study was to provide a more complete picture of cortical morphometric differences in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, decomposing cortical volume into its constituent parts, cortical thickness and cortical area. Methods: We analyzed magnetic resonance imaging images from a sample of 173 patients with schizophrenia, 139 patients with bipolar disorder, and 207 healthy control subjects. Maps of cortical volume, area, and thickness across the continuous cortical surface were generated within groups and compared between the groups. Results: There were widespread reductions in cortical volume in schizophrenia relative to healthy control subjects and patients with bipolar disorder type I. These reductions were mainly driven by cortical thinning, but there were also cortical area reductions in more circumscribed regions, which contributed to the observed volume reductions. Conclusions: The current surface-based methodology allows for a distinction between cortical thinning and reduction in cortical area and reveals that cortical thinning is the most important factor in volume reduction in schizophrenia. Cortical area reduction was not observed in bipolar disorder type I and may be unique to schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据