4.7 Article

Activation of Nuclear PPARγ Receptors by the Antidiabetic Agent Pioglitazone Suppresses Alcohol Drinking and Relapse to Alcohol Seeking

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 69, 期 7, 页码 642-649

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.010

关键词

Addiction; alcohol drinking; pioglitazone; PPAR gamma receptors; relapse; thiazolidinediones

资金

  1. University of Camerino

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone belong to the class of thiazolidinediones (TZDs). They were first developed as antioxidants and then approved for the clinical treatment of insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes. TZDs bind with high affinity and activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR gamma) receptors, which in the brain are expressed both in neurons and in glia. Methods: We evaluated the effect of PPAR gamma activation by TZDs on alcohol drinking, relapse-like behavior, and withdrawal in the rat. We also tested the effect of TZDs on alcohol and saccharin self-administration. Results: We showed that activation of PPAR gamma receptors by pioglitazone (0, 10, and 30 mg/kg) and rosiglitazone (0, 10 and 30 mg/kg) given orally selectively reduced alcohol drinking. The effect was blocked by pretreatment with the selective PPAR gamma antagonist GW9662 (5 mu g/rat) given into the lateral cerebroventricle, suggesting that this TZD's effect is mediated by PPAR gamma receptors in the central nervous system. Pioglitazone abolished reinstatement of alcohol seeking, a relapse-like behavior, induced by yohimbine, a pharmacologic stressor, but did not affect cue-induced relapse. In the self-administration experiments, pioglitazone reduced lever pressing for alcohol but not for saccharin. Finally, pioglitazone prevented the expression of somatic signs of alcohol withdrawal. Conclusions: These findings provide new information about the role of brain PPAR gamma receptors and identify pioglitazone as candidate treatments for alcoholism and possibly other addictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据